Using the `--badsum` Option with Nmap

This article explores the --badsum option in Nmap, which allows users to send packets with incorrect checksums.

Introduction

Nmap (Network Mapper) is a powerful and versatile network scanning tool used for security auditing, penetration testing, and network analysis. Among its many features and options, Nmap includes the --badsum flag, which allows users to send packets with deliberately incorrect checksums. While this option may seem niche, it can serve useful purposes in network diagnostics and security research.

This article explores the --badsum option, detailing its purpose, use cases, and potential limitations.

Understanding Packet Checksums

Before diving into the --badsum option, it’s important to understand what a checksum is. A checksum is a numerical value used to verify data integrity in network packets. When a packet is sent over a network, a checksum is calculated based on the contents of the packet and appended to it. The receiving system recalculates the checksum and compares it to the original; if they don’t match, the packet is considered corrupted and discarded.

Checksums are commonly used in:

  • TCP (Transmission Control Protocol)
  • UDP (User Datagram Protocol)
  • ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol)

By modifying the checksum of a packet to an incorrect value, it is possible to test how network devices and firewalls handle erroneous packets.

The Purpose of the --badsum Option

The --badsum option in Nmap is used to generate packets with incorrect checksums. This feature is primarily used for:

  • Firewall and Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Evasion: Some firewalls drop packets with incorrect checksums, while others may pass them to applications or logs. Testing how a firewall processes these packets can be useful for security audits.
  • Network Troubleshooting: Identifying whether a host or network device drops packets with bad checksums can be part of diagnosing network filtering rules or firewall configurations.
  • Research and Testing: Security professionals and researchers use --badsum to analyze packet handling mechanisms in different operating systems and networking hardware.

Using the --badsum Option

Basic Syntax

The --badsum flag is used with the standard Nmap command format:

nmap --badsum <target>

Example Usage

  1. Scanning a Specific Host

    nmap --badsum 192.168.1.1
    

    This command sends packets with incorrect checksums to the IP address 192.168.1.1.

  2. Scanning a Range of IPs

    nmap --badsum 192.168.1.1-100
    

    This command sends malformed packets to an entire range of addresses within the specified subnet.

  3. Using --badsum with Different Scan Types The --badsum option can be combined with different Nmap scan types, such as:

    nmap -sS --badsum 192.168.1.1
    

    Here, -sS (SYN scan) is combined with --badsum to send SYN packets with incorrect checksums.

  4. Combining --badsum with Other Flags

    nmap -sU --badsum 192.168.1.1
    

    This command performs a UDP scan with packets containing incorrect checksums.

Expected Results

Using --badsum, you may observe different behaviors based on the target system’s configuration:

  • Some systems will drop the packets immediately without any response.
  • Some firewalls may log the packets without blocking them.
  • Some IDS/IPS solutions may generate alerts.
  • Some improperly configured systems may respond, indicating weak security settings.

Since normal TCP/IP stack implementations discard packets with invalid checksums, you should not expect valid scan results when using --badsum. The primary goal of this option is to see how the network devices handle such packets, rather than obtaining an accurate list of open ports.

Limitations and Considerations

While --badsum is a useful option in some cases, there are important limitations to consider:

  1. Limited Effectiveness on Most Hosts: The majority of modern operating systems discard packets with incorrect checksums, making this option ineffective for traditional port scanning.
  2. No Reliable Port Scanning Results: Since the packets are likely to be dropped, Nmap will not receive standard responses, and thus it cannot accurately determine open ports.
  3. Firewalls and IDS/IPS Behavior Varies: Different security devices and software handle bad checksums in different ways. Some may log them, some may drop them silently, and others may pass them through to the application layer.
  4. Potential for Detection: Sending malformed packets could trigger alerts on intrusion detection systems, making it less useful for stealthy reconnaissance.
  5. Network Stack Implementation Differences: Different operating systems handle malformed packets differently, which means results can vary across networks.

Practical Use Cases

Despite its limitations, --badsum can be useful in specific scenarios:

1. Testing IDS/IPS Rules

Security professionals can use --badsum to determine how an intrusion detection or prevention system processes invalid checksum packets. This can help in tuning security policies to avoid false positives or to improve logging accuracy.

2. Firewall Rule Analysis

By sending bad checksum packets, you can test whether a firewall blindly drops them or forwards them to the target system. If a firewall incorrectly processes these packets, it may indicate a misconfiguration.

3. Network Research and Learning

For those studying network security or packet behavior, using --badsum can provide insights into how different operating systems and network devices handle invalid data.

Conclusion

The --badsum option in Nmap is a specialized tool designed for testing how networks handle packets with incorrect checksums. While it is not useful for traditional port scanning, it has practical applications in security testing, firewall rule validation, and IDS/IPS tuning. However, due to its inherent limitations, it should be used with the understanding that most hosts will discard these packets outright.

When conducting security research or audits, using --badsum in conjunction with other Nmap options can provide deeper insights into how a network processes different types of traffic. As with all security tools, ethical considerations and compliance with legal guidelines should always be followed when using this option.